🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn followers viewing you as a industry expert? Do numerous commenters applauding your advice on expanding your venture? Are headhunters reaching out to discuss collaborations?

If not, the reason might be your gender.

The Test: Changing Gender Identity to achieve Increased Reach

Numerous female professionals joined an organized professional network test this week following viral posts suggested that changing their gender to "man" enhanced their network presence.

Other testers modified their profiles to incorporate what they termed "bro-coded" language - adding results-driven business buzzwords like "propel", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Anecdotally, their exposure similarly increased.

Systemic Preference Questions Raised

The engagement increase has led some to speculate whether an inherent sexism in LinkedIn's algorithm prioritizes male users who use online business jargon.

Similar to many large networking sites, LinkedIn utilizes an algorithm to decide which posts are shown to which users - promoting some while suppressing others.

Company Statement

Through a blog post, LinkedIn recognized the trend but claimed it does not factor in "demographic information" when deciding post visibility. Rather, the company mentioned that "numerous factors" affect how content perform.

Changing gender on your profile does not affect how your content appears in results or timelines.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who changed her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her profile name to "a masculine version", described remarkable results.

"The numbers I'm observing indicate a sixteen-fold rise in visitor traffic and a thirteen-fold jump in impressions," she noted.

Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, began experimenting after noticing her reach decrease substantially.

The Method

• Initially, she changed her profile gender to "man"
• Subsequently, she used AI tools to rephrase her professional summary using "masculine-oriented" wording
• Finally, she repurposed previous content with similar "agentic" language

The result was immediate: a 415% increase in reach within one week.

The Negative Aspect

Although the positive results, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the method.

"Before, my posts were more personal - brief and insightful, but also warm and human," she explained. "Now, the masculine version was forceful and self-assured - like a Caucasian man being overly confident."

She abandoned the experiment after one week, saying "Every day I persisted, and results improved, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Some testers encountered favorable outcomes. Cass Cooper who modified both her gender to "male" and her race to "white" reported a reduction in reach and interaction.

"We know there's systemic preference, but it's very challenging to comprehend how it functions in specific cases or the reasons behind it," she remarked.

Wider Consequences

These experiments occur alongside ongoing conversations about LinkedIn's unique position as both a business platform and community site.

Platform modifications in the past few months have reportedly caused female creators experiencing markedly lower exposure, leading to unofficial tests where identical posts by male and female users received dramatically unequal reach.

Technical Explanation

Per LinkedIn, the platform uses AI systems to classify and spread posts based on multiple factors, including post content and the member's career profile.

The company states it regularly evaluates its systems, including "examinations of inequalities based on gender."

Company representative suggested that current reductions in some users' reach might originate from higher volume due to more content on the platform.

Evolving Environment

According to a tester observed, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be growing on the network.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more businesslike and polished," she commented. "This is evolving. It's turning into increasingly competitive and less controlled."